Article share options
Share this on
Forward this by
- Copy website website link
A Hobart court has heard there is nothing sinister or untoward when you look at the actions of a convicted rapist and killer as he joined up with numerous sites that are dating and utilized an alias on Facebook.
- Curtis served 32 years in prison for rape, torture and murder and it is a authorized intercourse offender
- The 64-year-old finalized as much as online dating sites and utilized an alias for Facebook while on parole
- Curtis ended up being sentenced to 3 months’ jail for breaching their community security purchase by perhaps not reporting their internet activity to authorities
Jamie John Curtis ended up being paroled in June year that is last serving 32 years for the duplicated rape and torture of the 19-year-old girl and also the murder of her fiance in 1986.
Curtis is just a subscribed intercourse offender and it is regarding the Community Protection sign up for life.
On the list of conditions imposed on people from the register is the fact that they need to report any phones that are mobile internet reports, account names and passwords to police.
The Magistrates Court heard within months of their release, Curtis had joined three internet dating sites — an abundance of Fish, nasty Date and Zeus — and had a Facebook account utilizing a name that is fake.
He used the Facebook messenger service to deliver two https://datingperfect.net/dating-sites/byber-reviews-comparison communications to a female he previously started dating after meeting her online.
The 64-year-old pleaded accountable within the Magistrates Court in Hobart to breaching the Community Protection Order and a restraining purchase.
Curtis has been doing custody since police searched their automobile and house in October year that is last seizing their cell phone.
He had been additionally faced with fraudulence offences but those charges were dismissed, after prosecutors tendered no evidence today.
Curtis ‘not especially able because of the internet’
Defence attorney Fabiano Cangelosi stated Curtis had “a belated 1980s knowledge of technology” and “a naive concept of your skill with a cell phone”.
“He came to be in 1955, jailed in 1986 and paroled year that is last” Mr Cangelosi said.
“the consequence of which was that in 1986 as he decided to go to prison, he knew of computers but he don’t get one … he previously extremely restricted utilization of a computer in jail.
“Emerging from prison he had been really an individual placing a base in to the twenty-first century with an awareness of technology from the 1980s. “
Mr Cangelosi stated that while Curtis had finalized to express he comprehended the conditions of this Community Protection Order and carried a duplicate from it with him on their phone, he would not obviously have a practical comprehension of just what the world wide web had been.
“He isn’t specially able aided by the internet, ” Mr Cangelosi stated.
He stated their customer “thought that the world wide web ended up being a fixed thing” that needed a far more active process to interact with and had been “naive” in what their mobile could do.
Mr Cangelosi stated the alias Curtis utilized on Facebook had not been designed to avoid authorities detection, but instead because he had been conscious that he will be the target of unwelcome attention as a result of their previous crimes.
There is “nothing by itself untoward as to what Curtis had been doing on the web internet dating sites”, his attorney stated.
Offences ‘not that serious’: magistrate
In sentencing, Magistrate Michael Daley stated he accepted the breach ended up being to some extent because Curtis was indeed in prison since 1986 and would not completely understand the online world.
“we additionally accept Mr Curtis wasn’t doing any such thing dubious by having an alias on Twitter … I think many would accept that, including me personally that is additionally on Facebook, ” he stated.
“To commit these offences while on parole is severe which is certainly an aggravating factor. “
Regardless of this, he stated the offences had been “not that serious”, but that any more offending would probably to see their face more imprisonment that is substantial.
Mr Daley sentenced Curtis to a three-month prison sentence — backdated by 6 months take into consideration the full time he had invested in jail because the breaches.
Curtis’ parole for their life phrase ended up being revoked during their amount of time in custody in which he will need certainly to re-apply towards the Parole Board to be re-released from jail